|
Press releases from US PIRG August 6, 2002
Nearly 30% Of Polluters Seriously Violating Clean Water Permits : Government Faulted For Lax Enforcement Of Clean Water Act
For More Information:
Richard Caplan
Liz Hitchcock 202-546-9707
Nearly 30 percent of the
nation's largest industrial, municipal, and federal facilities were in serious
violation of the Clean Water Act at least once during a recent 15-month period,
according to a report released today by U.S. PIRG. Permit
to Pollute: How the Government's Lax Enforcement of the Clean Water Act is
Poisoning Our Waters describes many shortcomings in the monitoring
of water pollution and efforts to deter polluters, at the same time that the
Bush administration has proposed slashing EPA's budget for enforcement.
"It is outrageous
that the Bush administration is proposing to slash enforcement budgets when
nearly 30 percent of polluting facilities are breaking the law," said
U.S. PIRG Environmental Advocate Richard Caplan. "With widespread violations
of the law, this is no time for the Bush administration to take cops off the
beat."
Using the Freedom of Information
Act, U.S. PIRG obtained and analyzed the behavior of major facilities nationwide
by reviewing violations of the Clean Water Act between January 2000 and March
2001, as recorded in U.S. EPA's Permit Compliance System database.
Major findings of the
report include:
-
The ten
states with the greatest number of major facilities in Significant Non-Compliance
(SNC) were Texas, Ohio, New York, Indiana, Tennessee, North Carolina, Alabama,
Louisiana, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
-
The ten
states with the highest percentage of major facilities in SNC were Utah,
Texas, Tennessee, Wyoming, the District of Columbia, Indiana, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, Kansas, and Ohio.
-
134 major
facilities were in SNC during the entire 15 month period.
To bring about consistent
compliance with permits and move toward the zero-discharge goals of the Clean
Water Act, U.S. PIRG recommends the following:
-
Set tougher
penalties. Penalties should be set high enough to remove any economic incentive
for polluters to break the law and to deter lawbreaking in the first place.
-
Allow
citizens full access to the courts. Obstacles to citizen suits should be
removed, including current rules that bar citizens from suing federal facilities.
-
Expand
the public's right to know. The public should have greater access to information
about enforcement, including the requirement of submissions of comprehensive
data by facilities that discharge into waterways and easy accessibility
of that data through online Internet searches.
The goal of the Clean
Water Act was to make U.S. waterways fishable and swimmable by 1983 and to
achieve zero discharge of pollutants to waterways by 1985. However, according
to the most recent EPA data, 40% of U.S. surface waters do not meet the fishable
and swimmable standard. Representative Pallone (NJ) has introduced legislation
(H.R. 5079) that would accomplish the recommendations listed above, and Sen.
Corzine (NJ) is expected to introduce similar legislation shortly.
"As we near the 30th
anniversary of the Clean Water Act, we urge Congress and the President to
listen to the public's demands for clean water. The Administration's proposed
cuts to EPA's enforcement budget take us in the wrong direction at the wrong
time," concluded U.S. PIRG's Caplan.
U.S. PIRG
is the national lobby office for the state Public Interest Research Groups.
State PIRGs are nonprofit, nonpartisan public interest advocacy groups. The
report is available at www.uspirg.org.
|
|